I’d Love To See More Of … Rufus Sewell

Cinema & TV,Cool People 15 July 2011 | 0 Comments

lordmarke

I wouldn’t have thought much of Ridley Scott’s 2006 production of Tristan and Isolde if it hadn’t been for Rufus Sewell’s performance. Why don’t we see more of this guy? Not only is he gorgeous but he can really act too (check out the video below for proof!!) James Franco was okay but I’m not a huge fan.  I find his acting a little bland (maybe I’m biased after sitting through 127 hours and feeling like the film took 127 hours to end!)

Sewell was captivating as the kind and vulnerable, yet brave and heroic Lord Marke of Cornwall.   Ultimately he is betrayed by his wife Isolde and his ward, Tristan, which is all the more tragic because never has there been a man more deserving of love.  It’s corny but it’s true.  Lord Marke is so loved by his people and essentially a very decent guy (having lost his hand in battle to save Tristan who was then a child and then taking Tristan into his care and favouring him over his flesh and blood, his nephew Melot).  It’s all just too sad and tragic for poor Marke.

I can’t imagine anybody having suited the role as well as Sewell.  He also gave a great performance as the very odd, but very brilliant biophysicist, Dr. Jacob Hood in Eleventh Hour (which was unfortunately cancelled) .  Here’s hoping that we see Rufus again in the bigger roles he deserves.

Here’s a clip of what is probably the best scene in Tristan and Isolde.  What a gorgeous scene that draws you into the heart of a man suffering in love. That doesn’t happen too often in the movies !

Tagged in , , , ,

The Way We Live Now – My Thoughts On The Adaptation Of Trollope’s Last Novel

Cinema & TV 11 July 2011 | 0 Comments

melmotte

I spent the last couple of evenings watching David Yates’ 2001 adaptation of  Trollope’s, The Way We Live Now.  I loved it. David Suchet is riveting as the devious but very charming,  Augustus Melmotte.   Shirely Henderson as his very odd, but ultimately likable daughter, Marie, is also superb and with stellar performances by Killian Murphy and Matthew MacFayden, the whole production is captivating from beginning to end.

The story has all the period drama necessities, top hats, cinched waists, and all sorts of dilemmas about love, marriage, wealth, social standing and reputation.  Think Jane Austen with a great big dollop of comedy.   Trollope obviously had a great sense of humour and has spilled this into many of his characters who at times can seem like caricatures rather than fully developed personalities.  But it works.  Sir Felix (Matthew MacFayden) is a lazy, immatature mummy’s boy, who gambles what little money his family have and plots to marry the very wealthy’s Melmotte’s daughter, Marie.  Of course, it all goes wrong, largely due to his pathological and childish self-centredness (and his gambling addiction too,  as he gambles away the money Marie gave him for their elopement).

Marie, who at the beginning of the series is to all appearances a spoiled and unhappy young rich woman, tolerated by her mother and beaten by her father, is for me the true heroine of the story.  Ecstatic at having at last found in Felix what she believes is a man who truly loves her  (as she is not the prettiest of girls) she shows herself willing to sacrifice everything for their relationship, including her fortune.  Felix being a superficial ‘blackguard’ ultimately rejects her and Marie finally sees the truth but in the process has grown into an independent and mature young lady.

What Trollope does brilliantly that is lacking other writing of his era is develop plot.   While he deals with the issues of social standing, love matches and wealth, by bringing the money hungry, unscrupulous Melmotte into the story along with Paul Montague’s plans to build a railway, he creates an intriguing plot that ultimately leads to the downfall of Melmotte.

Being an Englishman working in Ireland (and with a love of the Irish) Trollope understood the concept of stranger or outsider.   Originally, Trollope had planned that Melmotte’s character would be an Irishman.  Given that the Irish were largely despised by the English at that time, this would have given the character less chance of being accepted in London society.  As it happens,  without specifiying Melmotte’s nationality (but suggesting Eastern European, perhaps Hungarian), Trollope managed to make the character a crooked, deceiving but oddly likable man, who can attract the company of English ‘society’ because of his wealth.  He is not without charm and like all good con men has ample self-confidence.  But as Melmotte himself said, he stayed too long in England.  He enjoyed being an ‘English Gentleman’ too much and finally he became the victim of his own deceptions .

The portrayal of the Melmotte’s vulgarity (as foreigner unfamiliar with the etiquette of society), particularly through their eating habits adds fabulous comedic value. David Suchet, manages to portray Melmotte as almost animalistic.  The noises are at times like a tiger purring, and the these sounds made while contemplating especially suggest him as a person to be feared.  Suchet portrays the character amazingly.

Ulitmately, the stranger fails and the Englishman triumphs.  Melmotte kills himself while laughing insanely at the irony of a portrait he commissioned which sees him in a typically English, aristocratic pose. Montague, who was largely responsible for exposing Melmotte’s scams triumphs and builds his railways.   All of the loose ends are tied up when it comes to romance and love and even Sir Felix, banished by his mother’s new husband (and financial saviour) manages to maintain his gigolo habits while in some strange and foreign country.  It is ironic that Trollope ends the novel with Felix, the Baronet and gentlemen, becoming the stranger, in a country where title (which is all he had in England) means nothing.

There is so much more the the story than I have managed to tell here. I suggest, if you like period drama that you watch it.  Suchet is the real star and I guarantee, you will not be at all disappointed.

 

Tagged in , , , , ,

What Makes Denny Crane And Alan Shore’s Manlove So Great?

Cinema & TV 19 March 2010 | 0 Comments

8-boston-legal-jungle-04_16_39

Man-love, bromance, male-lationship, whatever you like to call it, Denny and Alan have it going on.  Can you believe that the famous balcony scene  (where most of the serious man-loving goes on) wasn’t written into the original script for Boston Legal?  Rather, at the end of filming, somebody realised they hadn’t made use of the balcony part of the set and lo and behold, David E Kelley, wrote the first of the balcony scenes that have come to define the show.

They are not first TV male couple to have a bromance (I’m thinking Chandler and Joey!) but probably because of Kelley’s amazing writing and skillful character development, Denny and Alan do it best.  Why does it work and why is it so captivating? I imagine it’s because Denny and Alan represent the impossible, two people worlds apart  (one  a Democrat and the other a Republican) and on completely different moral planes (one  a hotshot lawyer for the money, the other in it to fight injustice) who despite their differences still come together at the end of the day to bear witness to each others lives.

These two guys shouldn’t ever get along, but they do so maybe it’s a case of opposites attract. I think it’s more complex than that. Despite those differences Denny and Alan have many similarites. Both are irreverent when it comes to authority and are self-assured  about their own greatness, which Denny shows by repeating his name regularly and Alan more subtely with a silent stare complete with chin in the air.  Both are skirt chasers, and the irreverence they show for authority also spills over into their attitudes to women, which probably explains why they can never manage to keep one … and here comes the clue to why their man-love works so well for them.

Strip away all the politics, the money, the misadventures with women and what’s left  is two people sharing their humanity.  It’s like, if you can accept me for all our differences, well then you deserve to know me and here I am on the balcony sharing myself with you. It’s a remarkable gift Denny and Alan give each other. Together they witness each others lives without judgement.

They have the perfect relationship, uncomplicated by sex.  In fact, their adventures with women are often short lived or unfulfilling. Their womanly liasons are akin to the extra marital affairs -condoned and encouraged by each other. At the end of the day they do the important stuff, they come together as perfect soul mates to laugh together, affirm each other, hug, dream and smoke cigars. Now, who wouldn’t want that?

Tagged in , , , ,

Pierce Brosnan – Are ye Ameican or Irish?

Cinema & TV 12 March 2010 | 0 Comments

I didn’t think I could see Pierce Brosnan any worse than he was when he sang in Mamma Mia …. until I saw him playing an Irish immigrant in the 1981 mini-series, Manions of America.  I’ve got one question? How can an Irish actor be so bad at doing an Irish accent? Kate Mulgrew (aka Captain Janeway) is pretty rubbish too … sorry Kate, you can fly a starship but you’re no nineteenth century English lady!

Watch out for the part at 30 seconds.

“Are ye American or Irish?”

“I’m Irish”

Could have fooled us Pierce!!

Tagged in , , ,

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Featuring Recent Posts WordPress Widget development by YD